Ambidexterity and strategy in MSEs: a proposed Framework for local innovation agents
uma proposta de Framework para agentes locais de inovação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21574/remipe.v9i1.404Keywords:
strategic planning, Organizational Ambidestria, strategic behavior, micro and small companiesAbstract
T
The objective of this study is to present a framework composed of Strategic Planning, Strategic Behavior of Piauí's MSE managers, and Organizational Ambidexterity in local productive arrangements settings. This is an exploratory, descriptive, and propositional study. The definitions related to strategy, behavior and ambidexterity are presented and directors or professionals of the top management of companies registered in the ALI Program (Local Innovation Agents), developed by SEBRAE/PI, were analyzed. The proposition of a framework to analyze the Organizational Ambidexterity of MSEs can be considered a methodological and theoretical contribution of the research, aiming at the validation of theoretical paradigms, in order to contribute and expand studies to the existing theories on Organizational Ambidexterity. In a practical perspective, the research contributes to the improvement of the actions of governmental agencies of small businesses and of the MSEs themselves in the sense of improving the process of elaboration and execution of the Strategic Planning and, consequently, in the increment of the Organizational Ambidexterity.
References
ABUZAID, A. N. Testing the impact of strategic leadership on organizational ambidexterity: A field study on the Jordanian chemical manufacturing companies. International Journal of Business and Management, v. 11, n. 5, p. 328-339, 2016.
ADLER, Paul S.; GOLDOFTAS, Barbara; LEVINE, David I. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization science, v. 10, n. 1, p. 43-68, 1999.
ANDION, M. C.; FAVA, R. Planejamento Estratégico. Curitiba: Associação Franciscana de Ensino Senhor Bom Jesus, 2002.
ANDRIOPOULOS, C.; LEWIS, M. W. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, v. 20, n. 4, p. 696- 717, 2009.
ARRUDA, C. L.; MENCHINI, F.; RUSSO, P. T. Percepção sobre os Fatores do Gerenciamento de Riscos Corporativos que Influenciam o Planejamento Estratégico. Future Studies Research Journal, São Paulo, v.11, n. 2, p. 241-254, 2019.
ATUAHENE-GIMA, K. Resolving the Capability -Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation. Journal of Marketing, v. 69, n. 4, p. 61-83, 2005.
BASTIANI, Vinicius; GUTIERREZ, R. Ambidestria organizacional e gestão de processos: Uma revisão integrada da literatura. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO & INOVARSE, 2016, Rio de Janeiro. Anais […]. Rio de Janeiro: CNEGI, 2016, p. 1-22.
BENETTI, T.; KELM, M. L.; SEIBERT, R. M.; BAGGIO, D. K. Governança Corporativa: Planejamento Estratégico e os Conflitos de Agência na Empresa Familiar. Desafio Online, v.7, n.2, art.7, p. 333-354, 2019.
BENNER, M. J.; TUSHMAN, M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, v. 28, n. 2, p. 238-256, 2003.
BIRKINSHAW, J.; GUPTA, K. Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, v. 27, n. 4, p. 287-298, 2013.
BIRKINSHAW, J.; ZIMMERMANN, A.; RAISCH, S. How do firms adapt to discontinuous change? Bridging the dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity perspectives. California Management Review, v. 58, n. 4, p. 36-58, 2016.
BRANDT, E. A. Truelo de tipologias nas arenas das franquias de fastfood no Brasil: Porter x Miles & Snow x Mintzberg. Estratégia e Negócios, Florianópolis, v. 1, n. 2, p. 159-176, 2008.
BROWN, T. E.; DAVIDSSON, P.; WIKLUND, J. An operationalization of Stevenson’s conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior. Strategic Management Journal, Chichester, v. 22, n. 10, p. 953-968, Oct. 2001.
CAO, Q.; GEDAJLOVIC, E.; ZHANG, H. Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, v. 20, n. 4, p. 781- 796, 2009.
CHANG, Y-Y.; HUGHES, M.; HOTHO, S. Internal and external antecedents of SMEs' innovation ambidexterity outcomes. Management Decision, v. 49, n. 10, p. 1658-1676, 2011.
CHIN, W. W. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, v. 22, n. 1, p. vii–xvi, 1998.
CHIN, W. Partial least squares for researchers: an overview and presentation of recent advances using the PLS approach. C. T. Bauer College of Business University of Houston, 2000. Disponível em: http:// disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/indx.html. Acesso em: 30 out. 2020.
COSTA, L. S. V.; SILVA, J. F. As tipologias estratégicas “realmente” existem? In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DA ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DE PROGRAMAS DE PÓS- GRADUAÇÃO EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO, 26, 2002, Salvador. Anais[...]. Salvador: ANPAD, 2002.
COSTA, F. J. Mensuração e desenvolvimento de Escalas: Aplicações em Administração. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ciência Moderna, 2011.
DANNEELS, ERWIN. The Dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competences. Strategic Management Journal, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1095-1121, 2002.
DU, J.; CHEN, Z. Applying Organizational Ambidexterity in strategic management under a “VUCA” environment: Evidence from high tech companies in China. International Journal of Innovation Studies, v. 2, n. 1, p. 42-52, 2018.
DUNCAN, R. B. The ambidextrous organization: designing dual structures for innovation. In: KILMAN, R. H.; PONDY, L.; R.; SLEVIN, D. P. The management of organization design: strategies and implementation. New York: University of Pittsburgh, 1976. p. 167-188.
DUNLAP, D.; MARION, T.; FRIAR, J. The role of cross-national knowledge on DYE, R.; SIBONY, O. How to improve strategic planning. Mckinsey Quarterly, v. 3, n. 3, p. 40-49, 2007.
FAUL F; ERDFELDER E; LANG A.G; BUCHNER A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007.
GIBSON, C. B.; BIRKINSHAW, J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, v. 47, n. 2, p. 209-226, 2004.
GIMENEZ, F. A.; PELISSON, C.; KRÜGER, E. G.; HAYASHI Jr, P. Estratégia em pequenas empresas: uma aplicação do modelo de Miles e Snow. Revista de administração contemporânea, v. 3, n. 2, p. 53-74, 1999.
GRIFFIN, Abbie. The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 34, n. 1, p. 24-35, 1997.
GUPTA, A. K.; SMITH, K. G.; SHALLEY, C. E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of management journal, v. 49, n. 4, p. 693-706, 2006.
HE, Zi-Lin; WONG, Poh-Kam. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization science, v. 15, n. 4, p. 481-494, 2004.
HELFAT, C. E.; RAUBITSCHEK, R. S. Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities, and products. Strategic Management Journal, Malden, v. 21, n. 4, p. 961-979, 2000.
HILL, Susan A.; BIRKINSHAW, Julian. Ambidexterity and survival in corporate venture units. Journal of management, v. 40, n. 7, p. 1899-1931, 2014.
HOLMQVIST, M. Experiential Learning Processes of Exploitation and Exploration. An Empirical Study of Product Development. Organization Science, Pennsylvania, v. 15, n. 1, p. 70-81, 2004.
HUANG H. D; HUNG S. A. Investigating the Strategic Behaviors in Integrated Speaking Assessment, System, v. 78, n. 1, p. 1-23, 2018.
JANSEN, J. J. P; VAN DEN BOSCH, F. A. J; VOLBERDA, H. W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents andenvironmental moderators. Management Science, v. 52, n. 11, p. 1661-1674, 2006.
KARRER D. FLECK D. Organizing for Ambidexterity: A Paradox-based Typology of Ambidexterity-related Organizational States. Brazilian Administration Review, Rio de Janeiro, v. 12, n. 4, p. 365-383, 2015.
KATIC, M; AGARWAL, R. The Flexibility Paradox: Achieving Ambidexterity in High- Variety, Low-Volume Manufacturing. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, v. 1, n. 3, p. 69-86, 2018.
KAUPPILA, Olli-Pekka. Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships. Strategic organization, v. 8, n. 4, p. 283-312, 2010.
KRISTAL, Mehmet Murat; HUANG, Xiaowen; ROTH, Aleda V. The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance. Journal of Operations Management, v. 28, n. 5, p. 415-429, 2010.
LAVIE, D.; STETTNER, U.; TUSHMAN, M. L. Exploration and exploitation within andacross organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, v. 4, n. 1, p. 109-155, 2010.
LUBATKIN, M. H.; SIMSEK, Z.; LING, Y.; VEIGA, J. F. Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, v. 32, n. 5, p. 646-672, 2006.
MALHOTRA, N. Pesquisa de Marketing. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2012.
MARCH, J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, Chicago, v. 2, n. 1, p. 71-87, 1991.
MARQUES, J. F. S.; SANTOS, A. V.; ARAGÃO, J. M. C. Planejamento e sustentabilidade em Instituições de Ensino Superior à luz dos objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável. REUNIR: Revista de Administração, Ciências Contábeis e Sustentabilidade, v10, n.1, p. 14- 28, 2020.
MILES, R.; SNOW, C. C. Organization, structure, and process. Redwood City, CA: Stanford Business Books, 1978.
MINTZBERG, H. The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Free Press, 1994.
MINTZBERG, H.; AHLSTRAND, B.; LAMPEL, J. Safári de estratégia: um roteiro pela selva do planejamento estratégico. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2010.
MINTZBERG, H. Ascensão e queda do Planejamento Estratégico. Porto Alegre: Boohman. 2008.
MINTZBERG, Henry. Generic strategies: toward a comprehensive framework. Advances in strategic management, v. 5, n. 1, p. 1-67, 1988.
MONGE, Edgar Castro. Las estrategias competitivas y su importancia en la buena gestión de las empresas. Revista de Ciencias Económicas, v. 28, n. 1, p. 247- 276, 2010.
MOREIRA, C. R.; PEREIRA, B. A. D. A relação entre estratégia e performance em instituições de ensino superior privadas da região sul. Facef Pesquisa, Franca, v. 12, n. 1, p. 92-106, 2009.
MURRAY, J. A. A concept of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management Journal, v.5, n. 1, p. 1-13, 1984.
NETO, J. V.; MARINHO, M. S.; CARVALHO, P. S. Desafios da implantação do planejamento estratégico pela micro e pequena empresa. Revista Espacios, v. 39, n. 33, p. 92-115, 2018.
OJHA D; PATEL P. C; SRIDHARAN, S. V. Dynamic strategic planning and firm competitive performance: A conceptualization and an empirical test. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 222, n. 4, p. 192-220, 2019.
O’REILLY III, Charles A.; TUSHMAN, Michael L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in organizational behavior, v. 28, p. 185-206, 2008.
O'REILLY III, C. A.; TUSHMAN, M. L. Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, andfuture. The Academy of Management Perspectives, v. 27, n. 4, p. 324-338, 2013.
O'REILLY, R. D, Charles A.; TUSHMAN, Michael L. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard business review, v. 82, n. 4, p. 74, 2004.
PAPACHRONI, A.; HERACLEOUS, L.; PAROUTIS, S. Organizational ambidexterity through the lens of paradox theory building a novel research agenda. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, v. 51, n. 1, p. 71-93, 2015.
PEREIRA, Viviane Santos; ANTONIALLI, Luiz Marcelo. Ensino a distância: Estratégias de uma Universidade Federal. Contextus – Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, v. 9, n. 1, p. 33 - 48, 2011.
POSCH, Arthur; GARAUS, Christian. Boon or Curse? A Contingent View on the Relationship between Strategic Planning and Organizational Ambidexterity. Long Range Planning, v. 53, n.1, p. 56-80, 2020.
POSCH, Arthur; GARAUS, Christian. The Joint Influence of Strategic Planning and Ambidextrous Culture on Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Proceedings, v. 2016, n. 1, não paginado, 2019.
RAISCH, S.; BIRKINSHAW, J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, andmoderators. Journal of Management, v. 34, n. 3, p. 375-409, 2008.
RAISCH, S.; BIRKINSHAW, J.; PROBST, G.; TUSHMAN, M. L. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, v. 20, n. 4, p. 685-695, 2015.
ROSCOFF, R. K. S.; Becker, D. V.; Piveta, M. N.; Oliveira, M. C. S. F.; SANTOS, M. B. O Papel do Planejamento Estratégico na Manutenção dos Empreendimentos Graduados: Um Estudo Multicasos na Incubadora Tecnológica de Santa Maria – RS. Desafio Online, v.5, n.2, 2017, p. 278-297.
ROSING, K.; ROSENBUSCH, N.; FRESE, M. Ambidextrous leadership in the innovation process. In: ROSING, K.; ROSENBUSCH, N.; FRESE, M. Innovation and international corporate growth. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. p. 191-204.
ROSING, K.; ZACHER, H. Individual ambidexterity: the duality of exploration and exploitation and its relationship with innovative performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, v. 26, n. 8, p. 694-709, 2017.
SCHERER, F.L.; MUSSI, C.W. Comportamento estratégico: um estudo na indústria de plásticos de Santa Catarina. RCA - Revista de ciências da administração, v. 2, n. 4, p. 65 - 75, 2004.
SEVERGNINI, E.; GALDAMEZ V. C.; VIEIRA V. A. Efeitos do Exploration, Exploitatione Ambidestria no Desempenho das Organizações de Software. RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea, Rio de Janeiro, v. 23, n. 1, p. 111-134, 2019.
SHORTELL, S. M.; ZAJAC, E. J. Perceptual and archival measuresof Miles and Snow's strategic types: a comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. Academy of Management Journal, v. 33, n. 4, p. 817-832, 1990.
SILVA, J. F.; BRANDT, E. A.; COSTA, L. S. V. Truelo de tipologias estratégicas na arena das franquias de fast food no Brasil: Porter x Miles & Snow x Mintzberg. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DA ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DE PROGRAMAS DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO, 27, 2003, São Paulo. Anais eletrônicos[...]. São Paulo: ANPAD, 2003. Disponível em: http://www.anpad.org. br/evento.php?acao=trabalho&cod_edicao_ subsecao=48&cod_evento_edicao=7&cod_ edicao_trabalho=1854. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2020.
SIMON, H. A. Comportamento Administrativo. Rio de Janeiro: USAID, 1965.
SIMSEK, Z. Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, v. 46, n. 4, p. 597-624, 2009.
SIMSEK, Z.; HEAVEY, C.; VEIGA, J. F.; SOUDER, D. A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, v. 46, n. 5, p. 864-894, 2009.
SLATER, S. F.; OLSON, E. M.; HULT, T. M. The moderning influence of strategic orientation on the strategy formation capability – performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, v.27, n.1, p.1221-1231, 2006.
SOBRAL, F.; PECI, A. Administração: teoria e prática no contexto brasileiro. 2ª Ed. São Paulo: Pearson, 2013.
SOLLOSY, M. D. A contemporary examination of the Miles and Snow strategic typology through the lenses of dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity. 2013. 165 f. Theses (Doctor of Business Administration) - Coles College of Business Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, 2013.
TEECE, David J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, v. 28, n. 13, p. 1319- 1350, 2007.
TEECE, David J., PISANO, G.; SHUEN, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, v. 18, n. 7, p. 509-533, 1997.
TUAN, L. T. Organizational ambidexterity, entrepreneurial orientation, and I-deals: the moderating role of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 135, n. 2, p. 1-15, 2014.
TURNER, N., MAYLOR, H.; SWART, J. Ambidexterity in projects: an intellectual capital perspective, International Journal of Project Management, v. 33 n. 1, p. 177-188, 2015.
TURNER, N., MAYLOR, H., SWART, J.; ANTONACOPOULOU, E. Making it happen: how managerial actions enable project-based ambidexterity. Management Learning, v. 47, n. 2, p. 199-222, 2016.
TUSHMAN, Michael L.; O'REILLY III, Charles A. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California management review, v. 38, n. 4, p. 8-29, 1996.
WEI, Z.; YI, Y.; GUO, H. Organizational learning ambidexterity, strategic flexibility, and new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 31, n. 4, p. 832- 847, 2014.
ZIMMERMANN, A.; RAISCH, S.; BIRKINSHAW, J. How is ambidexterity initiated? The emergent charter definition process. Organization Science, v. 26, n. 4, p. 1119-1139, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 REMIPE - Revista de Micro e Pequenas Empresas e Empreendedorismo da Fatec Osasco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
