Submissions

Author Guidelines

RULES FOR WORK PUBLICATION

All collaboration proposals must be original and/or unpublished, typed in A4 page format (210x297mm) and in a text editor compatible with Microsoft Word, RTF or Open Office programs, with Times New Roman font, size 12 and the space between 1.5 lines.

It is observed, in relation to the articles that:

1. It must contain title, abstract and keywords, in the original language and in English.
2. The informative abstract, with 100 to 250 words, must inform the reader: purposes, methodology, results and conclusions.
3. The Abstract has no paragraph and must be written in plain text.
4. The keywords must be covered in the work and be limited between 3 to 5.
5. Articles must contain between 15,000 and 36,000 characters, without considering the title, abstract and keywords, and may be written in Portuguese, Spanish or English.
6. The articles must be divided into sequentially numbered subtitles, consisting of the following parts: 1 - Introduction: Containing, at least, the delimitation of the theme, justifications, problematizations and objectives; 2 - Theoretical framework; 3 - Methods or methodology; 4 - Results, analysis or discussions; 5 - Final considerations; References
7. It is not acceptable to use explanatory notes. Content that is relevant to the article must be incorporated into the text.
8. All tables, charts, figures and graphs must be numbered, have titles and source.
9. The text must strictly follow the APA (American Psychological Association) standards.

Evaluation Process

Original and/or unpublished articles are initially submitted for consideration by the Editorial Committee, in order to verify whether the formal specifications are met. Going through the initial screening, the contribution proposals will go through the merit evaluation process, during which they will be submitted to two ah doc reviewers (specialists in the area or themes in question), appointed by the Editorial Committee, who will protect the anonymity between reviewers and authors .

Ad hoc evaluators will judge the originality of the subject or treatment presented to the subject, the clarity of the wording and the standardization of citations and bibliographic references. If one of the opinions is positive (with or without modifications) and the other is negative, REMIPE will resort to a third ad hoc referee to resolve the impasse. This assessment will result in the approval or disapproval of the contribution proposal and, eventually, the request to the author of reformulations that meet the critics and suggestions of the reviewers. For articles and reviews, there are three opinion options:

• Accepted (positive opinion);
• Accepted with modification suggestions (positive opinion, subject to changes);
• Denied (negative opinion).

If the article receives a positive opinion with suggestions for modification, the critics and comments of the reviewer(s) will be forwarded to the author. The author will have 20 days to present a new version of the contribution proposal, which will be evaluated again, both by the Editorial Committee and by the reviewers who suggested the changes.

During the evaluation process, information in the text or references that may identify the author(s) should be removed. Once the work is accepted, these data can be included in the text in the final review.

Evaluation and publication time.

 The total time ranges from 5 months to 15 months.

Illustrations

      The illustrations (photos, tables and graphs), when absolutely essential, must be of good quality.

Quotes

Short literal citations (up to 3 lines) will be included in the paragraph, placed in quotation marks and followed by the author's surname referred to in the text, year of publication and page(s) of the quoted text, all in parentheses and separated by commas, as in the examples : (Drucker, 1995) or (Drucker, 1995, p. 32).

When the name of the cited author is part of the sentence, only the year and page number(s) will be placed in parentheses. Textual citations with more than three lines must be in their own paragraph, size 11.

References without literal citation must be incorporated in the text, in parentheses, indicating the author's last name, year of publication and page(s). 

The complete indication of the cited work must be placed in the References section.

References

References must be cited at the end of the article, in alphabetical order, according to the first author's last name and according to the publication date, that is, from the most recent work to the oldest. Author names, journal titles, books, publishers, cities, etc., should not be abbreviated. Technical standards established by ABNT or APA, as appropriate, must be strictly observed.

Ideological Responsibility

The articles whose authors are identified represent the point of view of their authors and not the official position of the Journal, the Commission, nor the Editors, the Scientific Committee, the Editorial Board, the Reviewers or Fatec-Osasco.

General observations

       a) The reception of texts for publication is continuous throughout the year. IMPORTANT: texts must be sent after rigorous spelling check.

       b) The Editorial Committee will not accept texts outside the established norms and reserves the right to make the final decision regarding their publication;

       c) Once the works have been published, REMIPE reserves all copyrights, allowing, however, their subsequent reproduction, with proper citation of the source;

       d) The editors of REMIPE created their own form for issuing opinions and control for recording and monitoring the texts received in their various stages (receiving the text; opinion; acceptance letter, modifications or rejection);

       e) Any doubts and omitted cases will be resolved by the Editorial Committee of REMIPE.

       f) There is no charge to authors for submission, review, processing, opinions and publications.

       g) It is necessary to include all authors in the metadata and inform the Orcid record of all authors. To obtain registration, go to: https://orcid.org/